GOETZ: I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into the letter you're about to read. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Ron Paul and his subtle but effrontive attempts to force his moral code on the rest of us. He represents a new breed of silly, chauvinistic radicals, but I guess nobody ever explained that to his forces. No one has a higher opinion of him than I, and I think he's a stentorian, sick porn star. I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that given a choice of having Ron create a regime of narrow-minded exhibitionism or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.
The main dissensus between me and Ron is that I allege that Ron's adages are a conduit that funnels belligerent thoughts into the heads of satanic, heinous marauders. He, on the other hand, contends that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. I want to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of militarism. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Why does he think that laws are meant to be broken? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Ron lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of his life I will restate what I said before for his sake: Like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak.
Ron desperately wants to be fashionable. That is to say, Ron wants nothing less than to hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his stubborn, heartless ravings. He wants to scrawl pro-separatism graffiti over everything. Faugh.
As Ron matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that by overusing such obscure words as "disproportionateness" and "mediterraneanization" he consistently manages to alienate his audience. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to Ron. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that he has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to destroy our country from within. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that the Universe belongs to him by right, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Neurotic Rhetoric. In the meantime, Ron contends that everything is happy and fine and good. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?
Ron wonders why everyone hates him. Apparently, he never stopped to think that maybe it's because even his devotees are afraid that he will marginalize dissident voices sooner than you think. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again and it is further evidence that Ron often argues that everyone who scrambles aboard the Ron Paul bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known underachiever and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that if I didn't sincerely believe that Ron's hortatory exclamation that it would be beneficial for him to instill distrust and thereby create a need for his saturnine views makes me think that we must respect each other and learn to live together in peace, then I wouldn't be writing this letter.
There is no doubt that Ron will strip people of their rights to free expression and individuality when you least expect it. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning, we must discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because when it comes to Ron's circulars, I think that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. The sooner we do that the better because Ron's views are antiquated, misguided, and sadistic. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Do Ron's revenge fantasies appear reasonable to anyone other than insipid gauleiters? A clue might be that after hearing about Ron's gloomy attempts to submerge us in a sea of sadism, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level.
Ron's shock troops all look like Ron, think like Ron, act like Ron, and rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood", just like Ron does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! I laughed so hard I almost cried when he stated publicly that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. You just can't make this stuff up -- at least, not without noticing that ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Ron would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being recalcitrant.
Unfortunately, the English language contains so few words of reprobation and invective that I cannot satisfactorily describe Ron's lackadaisical opinions. At least our language's lexicon is sufficiently voluminous for me to explain that Ron's taradiddles are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that Ron would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a hidebound act and they promote the mistaken idea that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies.
My only goal in writing this letter and others concerning Ron Paul is to make Ron pay for his crimes against humanity. Sure, it sounds uncompromising. Blame that on careless gadflies. If he continues to waste our time and money, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. As will become apparent before you know it, I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I decidedly hope that Ron serves a long prison term for his illegal attempts to break down the industrial-technological system.
Ron uses officialism to bowdlerize all unfavorable descriptions of his witticisms. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I clearly feel that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that when Ron repeated over and over the rumor that he is a spokesman for God, his cultists, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does he maintain that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't? Personally, I don't believe the answer has anything to do with credentialism. Rather, I believe it involves Ron's tendency to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. If we don't do something soon, his pouty prognoses will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people. Every time Ron tells his foot soldiers that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. It's considerations of this sort that make it worth our while to learn about the testy things Ron Paul is up to. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Goetz:
Ron Paul is a senile douchebag racist (then he crossed OUT the rest of this):
I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into the letter you're about to read. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Ron Paul and his subtle but effrontive attempts to force his moral code on the rest of us. He represents a new breed of silly, chauvinistic radicals, but I guess nobody ever explained that to his forces. No one has a higher opinion of him than I, and I think he's a stentorian, sick porn star. I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that given a choice of having Ron create a regime of narrow-minded exhibitionism or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.
The main dissensus between me and Ron is that I allege that Ron's adages are a conduit that funnels belligerent thoughts into the heads of satanic, heinous marauders. He, on the other hand, contends that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. I want to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of militarism. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Why does he think that laws are meant to be broken? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Ron lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of his life I will restate what I said before for his sake: Like a verbal magician, he knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak.
Ron desperately wants to be fashionable. That is to say, Ron wants nothing less than to hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his stubborn, heartless ravings. He wants to scrawl pro-separatism graffiti over everything. Faugh.
As Ron matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that by overusing such obscure words as "disproportionateness" and "mediterraneanization" he consistently manages to alienate his audience. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to Ron. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find that he has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to destroy our country from within. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that the Universe belongs to him by right, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Neurotic Rhetoric. In the meantime, Ron contends that everything is happy and fine and good. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from?
Ron wonders why everyone hates him. Apparently, he never stopped to think that maybe it's because even his devotees are afraid that he will marginalize dissident voices sooner than you think. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again and it is further evidence that Ron often argues that everyone who scrambles aboard the Ron Paul bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known underachiever and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that if I didn't sincerely believe that Ron's hortatory exclamation that it would be beneficial for him to instill distrust and thereby create a need for his saturnine views makes me think that we must respect each other and learn to live together in peace, then I wouldn't be writing this letter.
There is no doubt that Ron will strip people of their rights to free expression and individuality when you least expect it. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning, we must discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multirac ...
FTFY
(FIXED THAT FOR YOU)-------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Then somebody wrote,
"At first I was like,
But then I LOL'd!"
------------------------------------------------------
Gotta love Fark!! Never a dull moment, that's for sure!! HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
Love, Sassy Girl
No comments:
Post a Comment